Text
1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The deceased L (hereinafter “the deceased”) completed the registration of ownership preservation on June 26, 1995, and Defendant C completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant land on September 26, 2006.
B. On May 9, 197, the registration of provisional disposition was cancelled on August 8, 2008, when the registration of provisional disposition was completed with respect to the instant land by the Plaintiff as the creditor, and again on March 3, 2017, the registration of provisional disposition was completed on March 3, 2017, when the Plaintiff as the creditor, and the registration of provisional disposition was completed on March 3, 2017.
C. The Defendants are the deceased’s inheritors, and the Defendant C is the deceased’s grandparents.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 3, and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. The assertion and judgment
A. On August 30, 1996, the Plaintiff purchased the instant land from the Deceased.
However, Defendant C did not purchase the instant land from the Deceased, but completed the registration of ownership transfer on the instant land.
Ultimately, Defendant C is obligated to perform the registration procedure for cancellation of ownership transfer registration with respect to the remaining inheritance shares other than its own inheritance shares among the land in this case. The Defendants, the inheritor of the deceased, inherited the deceased’s ownership transfer registration obligation, and thus, the Plaintiff is obligated to perform the registration procedure for ownership transfer on August 30, 1996.
B. We first examine whether the Plaintiff purchased the instant land from the Deceased, on the premise that the Plaintiff purchased the instant land from the Deceased.
In the following circumstances, Gap evidence Nos. 2, Eul evidence Nos. 2 and 3 added to the purport of the entire pleadings, namely, ① The sales contract was not prepared regarding the land of this case, and the certificate of mountain sale (Evidence No. 2) submitted by the plaintiff was submitted to the plaintiff by the deceased.