A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

On September 7, 2015, around 00:40 on September 7, 2015, the Defendant discovered that the patrol of 113, the Incheon Central Police Station C, where the traffic guidance and control was on board, is waiting for signal at one lane, and the Defendant attempted to write down the back, knife, and knife at one minute, while moving to India for the safety of the Defendant, moving the chest of the above D from India to two arms, leaving the knife, and leaving the knife three times in drinking.

The Defendant continued to be arrested as a flagrant offender under suspicion of interference with the above performance of official duties, and moved along with D to the back seat of the patrol vehicle, and was at the time of Incheon Central Police Station, the Defendant’s scamblinged on the front seat of the patrol vehicle, and sold the ham of the above D one time.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers regarding traffic control and prevention and suppression of crimes, and at the same time, the victim D(41) with the right eyebrow that the treatment period cannot be known to the victim (2.5 cm in length).

On May 3, 2016, the Defendant, around 2016, at the F parking lot located in Gunsan-si E, around 14:40 on May 3, 2016, the Defendant injured the victim in an open upper part of the head’s diversacy, damage to the diversity of the head’s dives requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment, and injury to the victim in an open upper part of the diversity of the diversity of the head’s diversity, and the details of the oral and oral surgery.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 Highest 1138]

1. Entry of the witness D and H in each legal statement in the second public trial record;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with respect to D or H;

1. Copies of medical records; and

1. Photographs [The statements in investigation agencies and courts regarding the circumstances of the instant case by the victim D and the victim's Dong H do not seem to be specific, consistent, and different from others, and in particular, the victim D also recognizes the victim's assault facts disadvantageous to himself/herself, and credibility in such statements is deemed to exist].