logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.03.29 2015고합87 (1)
업무방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a member of the behavior group B, which is a violence crime group in the target area, and C and D are members of the behavior group E, which is a violence crime group in the target area.

The Defendant, together with C, D, F, G, and H, takes alcohol from October 30, 201 to October 02:00, 05:00 to October 30, 2014 at “K Points” in the operation of the Victim J, F and G enter the toilet, while entering the toilet, and the Defendant, C, and D, the vessel of the E and B organizations, as the vessel owner of the E and B organizations, “I will see the toilet.”

As the phrase “greging” refers to a person who is individually 90 roads per day and takes 90 roads, and provides a large amount of e-mail while carrying out personnel affairs in the same way even after having come to a toilet. C interfered with the legitimate business affairs of the victim by force, such as: (a) an employee L, who is an employee, “I are fright at any time; (b) is not frighted; (c) there is no frighting and drinking in money; and (d) there is no frighting and drinking in money; and (c) the Defendant and D interfered with the legitimate business affairs of the victim’s drinking house operation by force, including: (a) an employee, at any time; and (b) there is no flaging and drinking in money; and (b) there is no flaging and drinking; and (c) the Defendant and D interfered with the legitimate business affairs of the victim’s drinking house operation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each protocol or record book of examination of a witness with respect to G or L;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspects of D by the prosecution;

1. A copy of each protocol concerning the examination of suspects of F or G by the prosecution;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect by each police officer against the defendant or C;

1. Each police statement made against J or L;

1. CCTV photographs;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314 of the Criminal Act and Articles 314 (1) and 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment for a crime;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;

1. The scope of punishment: Fines of 50,000 to 15,000,000; and

2. Scope of recommended sentences according to the sentencing criteria: The sentencing criteria shall not apply since they have been selected by a fine.

3. Circumstances and attitudes of the crimes to be sentenced, the extent of damage; and

arrow