logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.02.16 2016고단2641
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than five years and six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant of "2016 Highest 2641" is a leader who has operated a system by organizing a number and successful bid in combination with the number for the neighboring merchants, such as the Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan City G market, between 20 years.

On March 2013, the Defendant had already known that it is impossible for the Defendant to operate and continue the system because the system of the system of the system of the system of the system of the system of the system of the system of the system of the system of the system of the system of which the obligation is accumulated for a period of several years is collapsed, and it is impossible for the Defendant to operate and continue the system of the system of the system.

Nevertheless, even though there was no guidance, and there was no actual intent or ability to operate the fraternity, such as making an agreement to provide guidance to the victims, etc., the Defendant had attempted to use it as a guidance to receive money from the victims who received money from the victims in the manner of “the repayment of the Defendant’s obligation and return,” and pay it to the other victims in the manner of “the repayment of the Defendant’s obligation and the repayment of the money,” even though there was no financial knowledge and the victims who were small merchants in traditional markets.

1. The Defendant, at the victim I’s house located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H on September 25, 2014, organized the number system up to 25 times per unit “In this case, 40,000 won per unit are joined, and if 25,000 won per unit are paid, the Defendant would pay the fraternity money without delay according to the net time that he wants.

“The phrase “ was false.”

However, in fact, the defendant used it individually from the members of the fraternity for several years, and as a result, it became insufficient to pay it to the members of the fraternity, the defendant borrowed money from the other members to replace it with or to the other members of the fraternity.

arrow