logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.10.12 2017고단3285
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant shall be the owner who organized a system of 30,000 won in total, consisting of 51 installments of the old unit that must deposit KRW 600,000 per month from around December 26, 2012 to February 2017. The victim D was a member of the above number system, and the said system was operated in a manner that preferentially pays a fraternity to the person who wants to receive a fraternity without an sequence, and where there are many applicants, it was operated in a manner that pays a fraternity through extraction.

Defendant: (a) A member of the five accounts of the said five accounts; (b) he received all his accounts; (c) did not pay the accounts from around October 2013; and (d) if there is no person wishing to receive the accounts, he lent the accounts to E; and (c) the Defendant did not pay the accounts on behalf of the said person, such as the occurrence of a situation in which he was unable to receive the said accounts; (d) the Defendant paid the accounts on behalf of the said person; (e) the Plaintiff did not pay the accounts on behalf of the said person; and (e) the Plaintiff continued to receive the accounts because he did not receive the said payments; and (e) the Plaintiff did not have any intent or ability to fully pay the accounts at the time of the occurrence of the damages, even if having received the said payments from the said persons.

Nevertheless, on October 28, 2013, the Defendant was in the normal operation of the fraternity for the victim on a normal basis, and was given KRW 66,600,000 in total until October 25, 2016, as if the victim wishes, the Defendant was given KRW 1.8 million from the injured party under the pretext of guidance.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and received 66,600,000 won from the injured party, as well as the victim, such as the case of the attached list 1.

arrow