beta
Text
The judgment below
No. 1 of the Judgment
(b) d.
Each crime described in paragraph, 2-b.
part concerning the crimes described in paragraph (1).
Reasons
1. Article 1-A of the judgment of the court below which rendered by the defendant the summary of the grounds for appeal.
paragraphs 2 and 2-A
No. 1 of the judgment of the court below with respect to each crime described in paragraph (1)
(b) d.
Each crime described in paragraph, 2-b.
8 months imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes described in paragraph (1) are too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. It is recognized that the Defendant’s judgment on each of the crimes against victims E recognized this part of the crime and against his mistake, and that the amount of damage caused by this part of the crime is not significant, and that this part of the crime could have been tried together with night buildings, intrusion and larceny for which the judgment became final and conclusive.
However, in light of the fact that there is still no agreement with the victim E, and that there is a history of punishment for the same kind of crime even before this part of the crime, and that the court below imposed a fine of KRW 2 million on this part of the crime in consideration of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, etc., the sentence of the court below on this part of the crime is too unreasonable.
This part of the defendant's assertion is without merit.
B. It is recognized that the Defendant committed this part of the crime during the period of the suspension of execution even though the Defendant had previously been punished for the same kind of crime for the same crime, and that the Defendant repeatedly committed the crime against an unspecified vehicle parked for a short time.
However, in full view of all the circumstances, such as the Defendant’s recognition of all of the crimes in this part and the violation of his mistake, the agreement with the victims was reached during the trial, the damage appears to have been recovered, the family members to be supported, the Defendant’s age, environment, family relationship, occupation, circumstances leading to the instant crime, and the amount of damage, etc., the lower court on this part of the crime.