beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 403,200 as well as the annual rate from August 30, 201 to October 11, 2013, and the next day.
Reasons
1. Details, etc. of ruling;
(a) Business authorization and announcement - Electric Power Resource Development Business (Construction Business of New Jinjin Nuclear Power Plants 1 and 2) - Public Notice B of the Ministry of Knowledge Economy on April 3, 2009 - Business operator B: Defendant
B. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation on December 17, 2010 (hereinafter “the instant ruling of expropriation”): The subject of expropriation: the Plaintiff, C, D, E, and F’s joint inheritance from G (hereinafter “instant land”): 12,86,00 square meters prior to H in the Gyeongjin-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, G, which was jointly inherited by the Plaintiff, C, D, E, and F: Compensation for losses: 12,86,000 won - the starting date of expropriation: An appraisal corporation on February 9, 201 - An appraisal corporation: Gyeongsung, C, C, C, E, and C (hereinafter “appraisal of expropriation”).
C. The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection on July 15, 201 (hereinafter “the instant ruling”) - The content of the ruling: Dismissal of an objection - The Central Land Tribunal’s rejection of the objection - The Central Land Appraisal Corporation and the Telecommunications Appraisal Corporation (hereinafter “Appraisal of an objection”).
D. G, the owner of the instant land, died on August 31, 1997, and G, the owner of the instant land, jointly inherited the instant land by G’s wife C, the Plaintiff, D, E, and F. The Plaintiff’s share was 2/11. The Plaintiff’s inheritance registration on the instant land was not made. (2) On February 8, 2011, the Defendant deposited KRW 12,86,000, the amount of compensation recognized in the instant expropriation ruling and the instant ruling as the “heir heir of the deceased G.” under the Daegu District Court Young-gu District Court Youngdong District Court Young-gu Branch Decision 2011No37.
3. On July 22, 2011, the Plaintiff reserved an objection on July 27, 201 and paid the full amount of the said deposit after obtaining a written agreement from the remaining successors of G on the purport that “the Plaintiff shall delegate all the authority to receive the entire deposit money of this case to the Plaintiff, and the Plaintiff shall make an agreement on the sole withdrawal of the entire deposit money,” and the right to increase the compensation for the instant land is also transferred from the other successors.