beta
Text
1. According to the expansion of the purport of the claim in the trial, the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.
Defendant E and F.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as follows. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. The following shall be added at the fourth 10-round end of the judgment of the court of first instance to a part added or written:
Around July 5, 2017, the Plaintiff paid an additional amount of KRW 1,600,000 in total with the medical expenses, etc. of I.S.The 4th 11th to 13th 13th 10 of the judgment of the first instance.
The 14th to 14th parallels in the judgment of the first instance shall be followed as follows.
Article 750 of the Civil Act as an operator of a vehicle, is liable for damages under Article 3 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act, or a tortfeasor under Article 750 of the Civil Act, and Defendant F is negligent in neglecting his/her duty of protection and supervision to prevent the vehicle from being stolen and driving, and thus, Defendant E is liable for damages under Article 750 of the Civil Act in relation to a child’s tort. The following is added to the end of May of the first instance judgment.
“In addition, according to the expansion of the purport of the claim in the trial, Defendant E and F are jointly and severally liable to pay to the Plaintiff 1,600,000 won and damages for delay calculated by the rate of 5% per annum as stipulated by the Civil Act from July 6, 2017 to November 16, 2018, which is the day following the payment date of the above insurance money, to November 15, 2018, the delivery date of the purport of the claim and the application for modification of the cause of the claim, and 15% per annum as stipulated by the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings from the next day to the day of full payment.”
3. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant E and F is reasonable.