logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2016.09.01 2015구합104366
해임처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 26, 1990, the Plaintiff was employed as a middle school teacher of the Geum-do Office of Education in Chungcheongnam-do and served in Daejeon District Office of Education from March 1, 2006 to Daejeon District Office of Education on March 1, 2006.

B. Upon receipt of a civil petition to raise an issue against the Plaintiff, the Defendant issued a special audit to the Plaintiff from November 27, 2014 to December 19, 2014. On January 29, 2015, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that he/she will take a heavy disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff violated his/her duty to serve as a public official, and that Cmiddle School principal, assistant principal, and school inspector neglected the management and supervision thereof.

C. On March 9, 2015, the Defendant requested a serious disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff to the Public Educational Officials General Disciplinary Committee (hereinafter “Disciplinary Committee”) of the Daejeon Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Disciplinary Committee”), and decided to dismiss the Plaintiff as the grounds for disciplinary measure (hereinafter “instant disciplinary measure”) as follows. On April 6, 2015, the Defendant dismissed the Plaintiff on April 6, 2015 (hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”).

From March 1, 2012, the Plaintiff, as a teacher working at Cmiddle School, has complied with the laws and regulations and has faithfully performed his duties. However, (1) the Plaintiff’s right to study and human rights infringement of students, the Plaintiff provided the students with a bridge during the class to “dacter,” and provided the students with an opportunity before other students, and continued a conflict with each other with the contents that are unrelated to the class within the class hours, such as verbal abuse, etc., and made the students’ personal attack remarks to the students who did not focus on the class, thereby deceiving their parents, and insult them with the words “I am, I am, I am, I am,” etc.

In addition, the plaintiff is class.

arrow