logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.07.19 2017누32533
추가상병불승인처분취소
Text

1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant regarding the disposition of non-approval of additional injury and disease with respect to the amount of loss of the base.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the dismissal or addition of part of the judgment of the court of first instance as stated in the following Paragraph 2. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. The court’s “court’s appraisal” in paragraph 21 of the third part is deemed to be “court’s appraisal (urterology)”.

The 6th parallel "lber" of the 4th parallel parallel, the 7th parallel "Jinber" and the 7th parallel "Jinber" respectively are described as "Minber" and the 13-15 parallel "Minber" are deleted.

In the front of the fourth 19th century, "the plaintiff shall be deemed to have caused the neutronic cysis and the neutronic neutronic neutism in accordance with the leutical pressure table."

The plaintiff's injury and disease of this case in the first instance of the fifth conduct shall be deleted, and the "this court" in the third instance shall be deemed to be the "court of the first instance."

The 5th to 6th 8th kings are as follows.

1) In full view of the facts acknowledged earlier and the following circumstances revealed in the medical opinion, it is reasonable to deem that the instant injury and disease occurred due to the instant accident or the injury or disease caused by the instant accident, and thus, the disposition to grant additional injury and disease approval for each of the above injury and disease is unlawful.

The part of the fifth 15-17 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, Etc. is deleted. The “court appraisal” of the fifth 18-17 of the fifth and sixth 7 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, Etc. is regarded as “court appraisal”. The sixth 9 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, Etc. add the following details to “2 of the instant injury and disease”. We examine whether the instant injury and disease were caused by the instant accident or the injury and disease.

According to the results of the request for physical examination of the head of the Geman University of the first instance, the examination of the court of first instance is conducted.

arrow