(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.10.12 2016고정1510

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.10.12 2016고정1510

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 9, 2015, at around 02:05, the Defendant was boarding a taxi operated by the victim B in the vicinity of the Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Seodong Middle School, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, and arrived at front of the king located in Guro-gu Seoul, the destination of which was erroneous, but the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol.

Therefore, when the police officer called up at around 02:14 of the same day requested for assistance by telephone 112, the police officer did not pay a charge on the grounds that the defendant was shouldered, paid a charge, the victim was driving the police officer, and put the vehicle in front of the crosswalk in front of the crosswalk, and the victim did not pay a charge again, while paying a charge, the police officer again did not pay a charge on the vehicle without paying a charge.

Thus, the above police officer sent a warning that he can be punished for interference with business if he does not pay the charge to the defendant again, and the defendant would be punished for interference with business, while the destination was changed, the defendant would be changed in the future in 10 meters, the victim would re-beted the vehicle in the future 10 meters, and the victim would re-beted to the error station in the future, while the victim is proceeding to the error station, the victim would re-be toward the king station, while the victim was going to the error station, and the victim would re-be in the front of the error 2 safety center.

Therefore, the victim could no longer operate, and the defendant made it difficult for the victim to operate his normal taxi business for about 30 minutes, such as fating the fat with the victim's fat without paying the cost of unloading from the taxi.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the victim's taxi business by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The statement concerning B;

1. Investigation report (verification of black boxes and images);

1. Application of the laws and subordinate statutes to taxi booms and video booms to photograph, taxi booms, and cream c.

1. Criminal facts;

유사 판례

-창원지방법원 2013.07.02 2013고정369

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.04.20 2018고단527

-창원지방법원 2014.02.13 2013고합189

-서울중앙지방법원 2014.09.25 2014고정3654

-부산지방법원 2013.06.17 2013고정2183