(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.04.20 2018고단527

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.04.20 2018고단527

업무방해

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Around 01:30 on December 19, 2017, the Defendant demanded the victim C (54) to get in the taxi in front of the Plaintiff to “Haan-dong Hyundai Apartment Complex” and arrive in the vicinity of the said apartment complex, and the victim re-enters in the vicinity of the said apartment complex, and the victim called “(Seoul, Young-gu Prisoners of War”) to get off the taxi, but did not comply with the demand of the victim again, but the victim did not demand again to pay the lower demand of the victim. Accordingly, the victim demanded the Defendant to pay the lower cost to the 16-lane of the Gwangju-gu Police Station located in 29 Ga-ro, U.S., U.S., 16, U.S. to get off the taxi, but the victim and the police officer in receipt of the report without paying the cost to the victim, and rejected the victim’s body and the police officer to take off the taxi within the scope of the taxi, such as the victim’s body and police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on receipt of taxi charges;

1. Although there are circumstances such as the pertinent legal provisions on criminal facts and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act regarding the selection of punishment (the choice of punishment, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years in the Seoul Southern District Court on August 12, 2016, and the judgment became final and conclusive on August 12, 2016, and committed the instant crime without being aware of the current suspended sentence, and the records of punishment for violent crimes are two times, the defendant committed the instant crime in the state of being detained to the extent that he/she is unable to properly memory the crime, such as the fact that he/she committed the instant crime in the state of drinking, the fact that he/she was aware of the occurrence of violent tendency in the state of his/her drinking, and that he/she would have the intention of improvement, and that he/she was smoothly agreed with the victim and the victim, and that recently, the detention of his/her child or the defendant was accompanied by excessive difficulty in surrounding family.

참조조문

-형법 제314조 제1항

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.02.19 2015고합248

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2016.05.13 2016고단414

-울산지방법원 2019.10.17 2019고단2742

-제주지방법원 2015.08.12 2015고단778

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2018.05.23 2018고단1220