1. On August 29, 2013, the Defendant’s “slurgical surgical surgical surgical surgicals” and “surgical surgical surgical sul

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On December 1, 2008, the Plaintiff is a public official who has joined the office B post office of Gyeonggi-do Administration on December 1, 2008 and is in charge of the business affairs until now.

B. On June 9, 2013, the Plaintiff participated in the 13th Postal Trade Union and the 19th Gyeong-gu World Headquarters as a representative player of the said post office (hereinafter “the instant World Organization”) and was faced with the other players and the other players. (hereinafter “the instant accident”).

C. On August 7, 2013, the Plaintiff alleged that the Plaintiff suffered injury from “the instant injury from the slives of the slives of the slives of the slives of the outers of the slives, post-slives of the slives of the slives, and slives of the slives of the slives (hereinafter “instant injury

However, on August 29, 2013, the Defendant issued a disposition not to approve the Plaintiff’s application (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the instant injury and disease was not an exercise of official duties, and there was no proximate causal relation with the official duties.

E. Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a request for review on September 11, 2013, and the Public Official Pension Benefit Review Committee dismissed the Plaintiff’s request for review on October 23, 2013 on the ground that it is recognized that the instant accident occurred in the course of performing official duties, but the slurgical stegradal sule in the slurgical slurgosis among the instant diseases is a slurgical sardal disease, and another slurgical disease is a disease caused by repeated trauma, and thus it is difficult to deem

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 4, Gap evidence 3-1, Gap evidence 5-1, 2, Eul evidence 1, and 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion was caused by the instant accident at the relevant World Cup, which is an event for official duties, and accordingly, the instant injury and disease occurred.

Even if the instant accident was not directly caused, the instant injury and disease were to be caused by the Plaintiff.