(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.07.26 2018고단1462

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 대전지방법원 2018.07.26 2018고단1462

사기등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 10, 2018, around 21:00, the Defendant: (a) was boarding a F taxi operated by the victim E on the street in front of the Seo-gu Daejeon Special Metropolitan City City, Daejeon Special Metropolitan City City, Inc. on the street; and (b) had the victim operate the taxi to the extent of not more than the opposite dong of the basin without the intent or ability to pay the taxi fee; and (c) did not pay the taxi fee of KRW 14,800; and (d) obtained pecuniary benefits equivalent to the said amount.

2. On February 10, 2018, in front of the H District Party G located in Daejeon Sung-gu, Daejeon, on or around February 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) a fluencing her friend, who was a police officer belonging to the said District Party, tried to verify the facts of the Defendant; (b) while under the influence of alcohol, the victim I, who was a police officer belonging to the said District, tried to verify the facts of the Defendant; and (c) the said E and the passage of the foregoing, before the victim, the Defendant insultingd the victim by “Y flue fri, kin, knife, knife,” and the fluse fri.

3. Interference with performing public duties;

A. On February 10, 2018, the Defendant tried to see the spare in a toilet with the spare in a bath while under the influence of alcohol, and the police officers who were on duty in the said earth area were prevented from doing so. On drinking, the Defendant assaulted the face of the saidJ one time, and interfered with the police officers’ drinking and the legitimate execution of duties in relation to the management of the earth area.

B. In around 21:50 on February 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) arrested the Defendant on the same ground as paragraph (a) of Article 3; (b) arrested the Defendant on the same ground as that of paragraph 3; and (c) assaulted the Defendant on the grounds that K used the police officer to assault the Defendant. The Defendant interfered with the police officer’s lawful execution of duties, such as the arrest, taking in custody, etc. of a flagrant offender.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. A complaint and a written statement of the I;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to K and J;

1. Article 347(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime and Article 347(1) of the choice of punishment.

참조조문

-형법 제347조 제1항

유사 판례

-부산지방법원 동부지원 2017.09.13 2017고단1433

-대구지방법원 서부지원 2018.11.13 2018고정454

-대전지방법원 2018.10.18 2018고단2978

-수원지방법원 평택지원 2016.08.24 2016고단1221

-부산지방법원 2018.06.14 2018고단1599