Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of seven million won.
If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
C (one-time D, the current stay of prosecution) determined a place to open gambling as a “neep,” and supervised the gambling process by soliciting gambling participants, etc., E and deceased persons are in charge of surveillance as to whether they come from the police while gambling is opened as a “leep,” and F are going to put gambling participants on a wing-down vehicle, and go through gambling as a “leep,” and G plays the role of paying money to the winners of gambling in accordance with the gambling’s plaque as a “leep,” and the Defendant and H (one-day) conspired to open the gambling as a “leep,” and to open the string as a “lick.”
피고인은 C, E, F, G, H, 성명불상자와 함께 2013. 2. 2. 23:00경부터 2013. 2. 3. 03:40경까지 고양시 덕양구 J에 있는 비닐하우스에서, 위와 같이 각자 맡은 바 역할을 하면서 K 등 도박참가자들로 하여금 속칭 ‘도리짓고땡’이라는 도박을 수십 회 하게 하고, 판돈의 5% 상당을 수수료 명목으로 받았다.
As a result, the Defendant, in collusion with C, E, F, G, H, and person in unsound name, opened gambling for profit.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Each prosecutor's interrogation protocol on the accused, E, L, M, F, N, K, P, Q, and R;
1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol of S or T;
1. Each protocol of seizure;
1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;
1. Articles 247 and 30 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;
1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;
1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 334 (1) of the Provisional Payment Order) of the Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 3354, Jan. 1, 2007) provides that the defendant's participation in the crime of this case may be relatively minor, and the defendant and her husband may not benefit from the crime of this case.