logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2018. 04. 26. 선고 2018두31450 판결
(심리불속행기각)이 사건 각 세금계산서 일부 거래처에서 수취한 매입세금계사서를 제외하고는 허위의 세금계산서에 해당한다고 봄이 상당함[일부국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2017-Nu-40695 ( December 12, 2017)

Title

(P) It is reasonable to view that the tax invoice constitutes a false tax invoice, except the purchase tax invoice received by some transaction partners of the tax invoice of the case.

Summary

(1) It is reasonable to see that the summary of the tax invoice constitutes a false tax invoice except for the purchase tax lending certificate received from some business partners of the tax invoice of the case.

Related statutes

Article 32 of the Restriction of Special Taxation Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2018Du31450 Decided the imposition of value-added tax and corporate tax

Plaintiff

Co., Ltd.

Defendant

OO Head of the tax office

Imposition of Judgment

2018.04.26

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Reasons

Although examining the grounds of appeal in comparison with the records of this case and the judgment of the court below, the main text of the grounds of appeal is determined not to include or not to accept the grounds under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition

arrow