logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안산지원 2015.04.21 2014고정1904
업무상횡령등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment for occupational embezzlement, etc. in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 23 of the same year.

From May 10, 2008 to May 9, 2010, the defendant provided a housing management business under the trade name of "D" in Si interesting City C.

The defendant was delegated to the entrusted management of the building from F (71 years of age, south) who is the owner of the building in the E commercial building in Si interest.

When the defendant is entrusted with the management of the above building, he/she has a duty to deposit the deposit money that he/she received with the complainant.

Nevertheless, around May 25, 2009, at the time of interest in the building of the complainant E 206 within D operated by the defendant, the tenant entered into a lease contract with the tenant G for the lease deposit of KRW 15 million, and arbitrarily consumed and embezzled the lease deposit of KRW 15 million received from the tenant G for the complainant.

B. The fraud did not intend to return to the revenue even if the tenant received the lease fund from the complainant F due to the lack of the tenant's moving-out.

Nevertheless, on March 18, 2009, the Defendant made a false call to the complainant at a place where the location is unknown, and then sent 10 million won of the rent to 15 million won to ASEAN’s bank account. The Defendant made a false call to the Respondent and sent 10 million won of the rent to the Lessee’s bank account (J). Accordingly, she received KRW 10 million from the Respondent to the Lessee’s account (J). Accordingly, she was sent from the Respondent to the Respondent on February 3, 2010, and then called “302 tenant K would move out of 302 tenant. The rent in the past is reduced by 2 million won to the Lessee.” Thus, she sent 15 million won of the rent to the Respondent.”

Therefore, it is the name of I from the complainant.

arrow