A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant, in the course of occupational breach of trust, has concluded a lease agreement with the victim’s G (in any other case, 57 years old) who is the owner of the Ftel B B 808, in Bupyeong-si Etel No. 1622 and 1108, and the Ftel B 808, on the ground that the term of lease for the above officetel is expired, the Defendant was delegated to the tenant of the above officetel, with the authorization of the victim individually.

Therefore, the Defendant is not obliged to enter into an officetel lease agreement or a contract to modify the terms and conditions of the agreement with the tenant because it has not been comprehensively delegated by the victim to enter into an officetel lease agreement or a contract to change the terms and conditions of the agreement with the tenant.

On September 4, 2010, the Defendant, in violation of the above duties, concluded a lease contract with the tenant Ha for KRW 20 million, monthly rent of KRW 400,000,000,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000 won, which was paid from H, was used for the personal purpose of the Defendant, for the remainder of KRW 15,000,000,000,000,000,0000 won, which was paid from H without notifying the victim.

As a result, the defendant has the victim bear the obligation to return the lease deposit of KRW 15 million to H, thereby incurring property damage, and the defendant acquired property benefits equivalent to the same amount.

B. On September 13, 2010, the Defendant entered into a lease agreement with the tenant I for KRW 20 million, monthly rent 400,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000