1. On November 12, 2012, the Defendant revoked the disposition of non-approval for medical care granted to the Plaintiff.

2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 4, 2012, while the Plaintiff was working as a factory in the production management team in the Daegu-gun District C (hereinafter “Nonindicted Company”) located in the production management team, the Plaintiff complained of and took advantage of Agropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic frhetoric fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic fropic

B. On October 6, 2012, the Plaintiff asserted that the instant injury was caused by occupational malpractice and stress, and the Defendant filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant. However, on November 12, 2012, the Defendant issued a disposition of non-approval of medical care (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that “The occurrence of a sudden and difficult incident related to the pertinent duties within 24 hours prior to the outbreak, and the rapid change in business environment, are not objectively confirmed, and there is no objective proof to acknowledge physical and mental aggravation to the extent that it could have considerable influence on normal functions in relation to the transfer of the outbreak, and thus, the causal relationship between the Plaintiff’s duties and the instant injury branch is not recognized” (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's evidence 1, Gap's evidence 2, Gap's evidence 3-1, 2, and Gap's evidence 5, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion was produced by the non-party company upon receiving an order of the agricultural boiler for the purpose of preventing the damage of crops to the air conditioning on the winter iron, and the plaintiff worked as the factory site of the non-party company. The above agricultural boiler has a large amount of orders between July and October each year, and it has to be produced and installed for October each year, and the plaintiff has to complete the production and installation of the boiler. Thus, the plaintiff has set an additional work and the field work to meet the supply deadline during the above period.