Text
The prosecution of this case is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Around 01:56 on July 30, 2015, the Defendant publicly insultd the victim by openly referring to the following: “The Defendant would pay the victim money if he/she does not perform the same fluorous fluorous fluor, and would not pay the amount of food at the C shop located in the Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, Cheongju-si, to ask the victim E, who was dispatched to the scene, to ask the Defendant whether he/she wishes to pay the drinking value, without any special reason: (a) he/she is reported by several persons, such as F and employees G, etc., who are the main owners of the D district, without any special reason.”
2. Determination
(a) An offense subject to prosecution upon complaint: Article 312 (1) of the Criminal Act;
B. On August 31, 2015, the victim following the institution of public prosecution;
(c) Public prosecution dismissal: Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act;