logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 충주지원 2013.06.21 2013고단210
도로교통법위반(사고후미조치)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BFIS car.

On February 16, 2013, the Defendant driven the above car on 01:10 on February 16, 2013, and continued to proceed to the village of the village of the bachelor's village, which is in the short-term operation of the Chungcheong City.

The place is that there were vehicles parked on both side streets along the house, so there was a duty of care to operate safely by accurately operating steering devices and brakes for drivers.

그럼에도 불구하고 피고인은 이를 게을리 한 채 그대로 진행한 과실로 피고인의 승용차 오른쪽 앞범퍼 부분으로 피고인의 진행방향 오른쪽에 주차되어 있던 C 스타렉스 승합차의 왼쪽 뒷범퍼 부분을 들이받고, 연이어 피고인의 승용차 왼쪽 앞펜더 부분으로 피고인의 진행방향 왼쪽에 주차되어 있던 D 무쏘밴 승용차의 오른쪽 앞범퍼 부분을 들이받았다.

Ultimately, the Defendant did not take necessary measures to ensure smooth traffic by destroying and destroying the repair cost for the replacement, etc. of the said rocketing vehicles to KRW 787,035,00,000 for the repair cost for the replacement, etc. of the front-out vehicles by occupational negligence, and not taking necessary measures to ensure smooth transportation.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of the accused by prosecution;

1. Each written statement concerning E and F;

1. The actual condition of traffic accidents;

1. An accident site photograph;

1. Application of each written estimate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of the Road Traffic Act and Articles 148 and 54 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. A extenuating circumstances for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act that are disadvantageous to the reason for sentencing: the Defendant did not take any measures despite a traffic accident that damages two vehicles, and the Defendant committed the instant crime again even though he had the same criminal record.

arrow