1. The judgment of the court of first instance is modified as follows.

Seoul Central District Court 201 Gohap161 was authorized in the case.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance citing this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the court renders a dismissal or another additional determination as to a new argument in the defendant's trial as follows, and thus, citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. Parts used or added;

A. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance, which was accepted, shall be as follows: the part of the 6th to 7th of the 6th judgment (1. d. of the 1. d.).

(d) The particulars of defects after the completion of the inspection on the common area of the apartment of this case are as listed in the attached Table 1, the contents of defects after the completion of the inspection are as listed in the attached Table 2. The contents of defects after the completion of the inspection are as listed in the attached Table 3. Meanwhile, the defects after the completion of the inspection are as stated in the attached Table 1, 2, and 3 are as follows. within one year from the start date of the warranty period under the premise that the repairs method for the rupture of the outer walls are also as follows: 3. The defects falling under the scope of the C Guarantee No. 1363, 147, 297, 397, 467, 197, 297, 397, 467, 297, 19757, 397, 4797, 297, 19757, 297, 4797, 19757, 2974