logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.04.21 2015고정623
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:50 on August 30, 2014, the Defendant stolen the Defendant’s property worth KRW 16,000,000, totaling KRW 1610,000,00,000, in cash located in Asan City B, Asan City B, and 1st underground floor C, where the victim D, who is the owner, was a business owner, was in a lock-down and was in a lock-down, with the market value equivalent to KRW 200,00,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,00,000,000,00,000,00,00,00,00

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site photographs, field ctv reading photographs, and places where damaged articles are collected;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 329 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the amount of damage that the defendant stolen from the injured person for the reason of sentencing has reached KRW 1,616,00,00, and some damaged goods have not been returned, and the victim has not been agreed with. On the other hand, among the damaged goods, the amount of KRW 1,616,00 has been returned, Samsung Card 1, Samsung Card 1, Nonghyup Card 2, operation license, 1,086,00 among the damaged goods, and the amount of KRW 1,616,00 has been returned, 1,000 has been hospitalized due to mental illness, the defendant was hospitalized. The defendant is a recipient under the National Basic Living Security Act, the defendant was first and was aware of the crime, and the defendant is against the defendant's age, sex, and environment, and other various sentencing conditions stated in the argument of this case including the defendant'

arrow