The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant in the facts charged in the instant case is a person driving a vehicle for riding the horse bill B.

On May 15, 2013, the Defendant, while driving a vehicle on duty and driving the vehicle on duty, has a duty of care to change the course from the three-lane to the two-lane road in the direction of the new south-distance distance from the south-dong, Nam-gu, Daegu-dong commercial building Pungsan-dong to shift the course from the three-lane to the two-lane road in the direction of the new south-do.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and neglected to change the course to the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and instead instead of a number plate driven by the victim C (Nam, 19 years old) who followed the same direction as the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle, received the front wheels of the Defendant’s vehicle.

As a result, the Defendant suffered from occupational negligence on the part of the winners D (Nam, 18 years of age) for about four weeks the injury, i.e., the “malopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics, etc.

2. The judgment is a crime falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be discussed against the victim’s express intent under the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to each agreement submitted by the defendant on October 24, 2013, it is recognized that the victims do not want punishment any longer by the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of