logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2013.04.30 2012고정1511
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 20, 2010, the Defendant of the 2012 High-Family 1511, the Defendant driven B truck with a distance of about 30 meters from around 23:30 on November 20, 2010 to around 112 of the apartment complex 412 in front of the same apartment complex 4.12.

On June 14, 2010, the Defendant conspired with C and D to enter the fact in the public service center of the Yangsan Viewing Center, and had the public official in charge where the name of the public service center is not known as if the Defendant had been married in a normal state of marriage as if he had been married, the Defendant submitted a marriage report to the public official in charge where the name of the public service center is not known as if he had been married in a normal state of marriage with D and had the said public official enter the fact in the electronic records register.

As a result, the Defendant conspired with C and D to make a false report to the public official to enter false facts in the family relations register, which is a public electronic record, and around that time, had the above public official keep the family relations register, which is the above public electronic record stating false facts.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. The circumstantial report on the driver and the report on detection of the driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on marriage relation certificates

1. Article 148-2 Subparag. 1, Article 44(1) of the former Road Traffic Act (amended by Act No. 10382, Jul. 23, 2010); Article 228(1), Article 229, and Article 30 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of entry and exercise of false information, such as public electromagnetic records) and the selection of fines, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;

arrow