beta
Text
Defendant
All appeals filed by A and prosecutor are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Summary of grounds for appeal;
A. Defendant A’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
B. In full view of the statements, etc. by the prosecutor I and J, the Defendants, along with I and J, conspired with the victim to engage in deceptions by using the hand technology, and acknowledged the facts that the Defendants had engaged in deceptions in the instant case, but there is insufficient evidence to prove that I and J used the handphones to the victim, thereby not guilty of this part of the facts charged on the ground that the lower court erred by misapprehending the facts and adversely affected the conclusion of the judgment.
2. As to the Defendant A’s assertion of unfair sentencing, Defendant A’s judgment on the assertion of unfair sentencing is a favorable circumstance, such as the fact that he/she made a confession of all crimes, did not cause actual damage to the victim, and the victim did not want punishment.
However, Defendant A had been investigated by an investigative agency on the ground of the fact that Defendant A conspired with AB, etc. to engage in deceptions against the victim even though he had been aware of the fact that Defendant A had been aware of the fact that he had been investigated by the investigative agency on the ground that he had got about 50 million won from U by making scambling in collusion with AB, etc. and got scam to scam on the coffee, and then acquired approximately 50 million won by scam from scam. However, even though Defendant A had been investigated on the ground that it was insufficient to recognize Defendant A’s suspicion as a result of the investigation, Defendant A was subject to a non-suspect disposition on the ground that he had been investigated under the above suspicion, but Defendant A conspiredd with Defendant A, etc. and committed the crime of this case, but Defendant A did not have to receive such misunderstanding again, and thus, Defendant A did not have any reason to deem Defendant A’s punishment as unjust.
3. A prosecutor;