1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Comprehensively taking account of the purport of the entire pleadings in the statement No. 1 of the judgment as to the cause of the claim, the Defendant would pay KRW 200 million to the Plaintiff on December 10, 201, and the Defendant would pay to the Plaintiff KRW 31, 201 if the Plaintiff did not marry until December 31, 2016.

'Agreement' under the above 'Agreement' shall be written respectively (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement of this case").

2) The court below held that each of the instant letters violated good morals and other social order under Article 103 of the Civil Act, and thus, the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the presumption of good faith. The court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the presumption of good faith and the principle on the presumption of good faith and the principle on the presumption of good faith and the principle on the presumption of good faith and the principle on the presumption of good faith and the principle on the presumption of good faith.

this article argues that the effect is null and void.

2 According to the results of this court's inquiry and reply to the head of Seoul Immigration and Foreigner's Office, the defendant has been living in Japan for a long time with the plaintiff, and during this process, the amount equivalent to the plaintiff's credit card was consumed.

However, on the ground that there are the above circumstances, the instant agreement to pay a large amount of money if the Defendant is not married with the Plaintiff is expressed in a serious restraint on the Defendant’s status decision-making. Therefore, it is reasonable to deem it null and void against social order.

Therefore, the defendant's defense is justified.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.