logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.07.06 2017나63009
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition or dismissal as set forth in paragraph (2) below, and thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. On the 2nd page of the judgment of the first instance, the addition or the addition shall be as follows:

E. According to an objection filed by the Defendant, etc. against the above adjudication, the Central Land Tribunal rendered a ruling to increase compensation for the land and goods owned by the Defendant, etc. on November 23, 2017. On December 18, 2017, the Plaintiff additionally deposited KRW 83,817,360 as Busan District Court Decision 201Da9427, supra, with the increased compensation prescribed by the said ruling.

Part 2 of the judgment of the first instance (based on recognition) No. 14 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be written by inserting "each description of evidence No. 1 to No. 4 of the judgment of the court of first instance" with "each description of evidence No. 1 through No. 6".

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow