1. The Plaintiff’s respective appeals against the Defendants and the Defendant C’s selective addition to this Court.

The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the case as described below (2). Thus, this case is quoted as it is by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(The grounds for appeal by the Plaintiff do not differ significantly from the allegations in the first instance court, and the fact-finding and determination in the first instance court are recognized as legitimate even if the additional arguments and evidence were to be presented by this court). The part of the first instance judgment, which was written, is 3-4 of 26 pages 26 of the first instance judgment, are as follows: “4. Determination on claims against Defendant C, E, F, G, H, and J.”

On the 26th 14th 15th 15th 26th 15th 26th 10 of the first instance judgment, the part of the “Defendant C, E, and F succeeded to the net D’s damage liability.” The part of “Defendant C, E, and F succeeded to the network D’s damage liability.”

In conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants should be dismissed on the ground that all of the claims against the Defendants are without merit. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s appeal against the judgment of the first instance as to the same conclusion and the Plaintiff’s claim for selective addition and extended claims against the Defendant C by this court