logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원순천지원 2020.11.19 2020고단66
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

except that the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 02:31 on January 9, 2020, the Defendant: (a) took a parked vehicle while driving a motor vehicle in front of the road in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the Republic of Korea and received 112 a report; (b) took a bath, such as “the police officer who is required to take a drinking test” from E (Nam, 30 years of age) who is a police officer belonging to the police station in the Southernn Police Station D Zone in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the police station, and carried out

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

On January 9, 2020, the Defendant, at around 02:31, 202:31, was demanded to respond to a drinking test by inserting three motor vehicles parked on the front side of G at the time of drinking at around 02:45 on the same day, after receiving a report on 112 with respect to the shocking of three motor vehicles parked on the front side of G, and to be deemed to have driven under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling, sniffing, sniffing, red, sniffing, etc., of the Defendant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not comply with a police officer’s request for a alcohol test without justifiable grounds, such as taking a bath to the above E and refusing to take a alcohol test.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement "F of 2020 order66" and each police statement of 2020 order order and video materials "29 order and video materials";

1. Report on the circumstances of the driving of a drinking house and on the circumstantial statement of a drinking driver;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (as to the request for a negative measurement and the attachment of rejected images);

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act, Articles 148-2 (2) and 44 (2) of the Road Traffic Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38(1)2 of the Criminal Act are applicable;

arrow