logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2016.10.27 2016누52899
부당해고구제재심판정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim, even if the Plaintiff’s claim was examined in the first instance court and the first instance court, is not significantly different from the Plaintiff’s claim in the first instance court, and all evidence submitted in the first instance court and the first instance court are examined. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in its conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the Plaintiff

arrow