1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal, including the part arising from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

The court's explanation of this case is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this case in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(1) The court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim, even if the Plaintiff’s claim was examined in the first instance trial, is not significantly different from the Plaintiff’s claim in the first instance trial, and all evidence submitted in the first instance trial are examined, the court of first instance that rejected the Plaintiff’s claim is justifiable. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the Plaintiff’s appeal.