1. In relation to the traffic accident stated in the separate sheet, a mutual aid agreement for the plaintiff's defendant stated in the separate sheet is made.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to B-city bus owned by the dispatching Transport Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Plaintiff bus”).

B. At around 22:45 on December 22, 2015, C, the driver of the Plaintiff bus, operated the Plaintiff bus with the first line of the second line on the side of the off-gas filling station located along the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the Plaintiff bus, following the entry into the intersection in accordance with the straight line signal of the signal apparatus at the intersection, at the time when the crossing was opened to the intersection, the Plaintiff bus was driven by the Defendant on the back of the side of the side of the Plaintiff bus and the Plaintiff bus driver was driven by an accident that the left side of the side of the side of the side of the side of the Plaintiff bus was caused by the front side of the side of the side of the Defendant bus.

hereinafter referred to as the "traffic accident of this case". Accordingly, the defendant suffered injury, such as the structural frame of the 4th left balance, the escape of the neighboring part of the 4th left part, the sloping of the new sloping, the 4th left part, and the structural aggregate of the 4th left part. [The facts that there is no dispute over the grounds for recognition, the entries and images of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5

2. The plaintiff asserts that the traffic accident of this case occurred entirely by the defendant's negligence, and that there is no negligence on the part of the plaintiff bus driver, and that there is no obligation to pay mutual aid money from the traffic accident of this case to the defendant, while the defendant asserts that there is no negligence on the part of the plaintiff bus driver.

In a lawsuit seeking confirmation of existence of a pecuniary obligation, if the plaintiff, who is the debtor, specified the first claim to deny the fact that the cause of the obligation occurred, the defendant, the creditor, bears the burden of proving the fact that the legal relationship exists, and in this case, the plaintiff.