1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. Around 12:00 on October 15, 2016, Defendant B, a driver of the high-speed tourism company, was driving a C bus (hereinafter “instant bus”) and had a traffic accident in contact with the side of the D vehicle running on the surface of the U.S. car, which is the one-lane map located in both sides of the Sinnam-si, Manam-si, Sungnam-si, and the two-lane roads located in both sides of the Sinsan-si, Sungnam-si, and is proceeding from the shooting distance protection of the South Korean mountain basin to the North Korean mountain basin.

(hereinafter referred to as “elective shop”). (b)

The drivers of Defendant B and D vehicles stopped each vehicle in a state of emergency, etc. on the right side of the lane where the bus in this case was in operation after the preceding accident, and confirmed the situation of accident. In this process, the bus in this case occupied most of the lanes and prevented the passage of other vehicles, and passengers of the bus in this case announced the passage of other vehicles on the front side and rear side of the bus in this case.

C. After confirming the situation of the preceding accident, Defendant B was boarding the bus of this case with passengers, and the Plaintiff was driving the said South Korean Industrial Complex in the area of a shooting distance from the South Korean Industrial Complex, which is the part adjacent to the bus of this case. As the numberless vehicles that were located after the bus of this case intrudes with the central line, the Plaintiff suffered injury, such as salted cages, tensions, etc. of the catus catage catus, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment by shocking the retaining wall while avoiding the above imprisoned vehicles.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). [Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, Eul evidence No. 1 (including each number), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident occurred on the road by negligence of Defendant B who illegally stopped the instant bus on the road without taking safety measures against the vehicles following the occurrence of the prior accident and following the occurrence of the instant accident. As such, the Defendants shared the Plaintiff on March 3, 200.