logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2015.06.19 2015고정883
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 9, 2015, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at a level of 0.096% of blood alcohol level, driven BFD car at approximately 50 meters from the 50-meter radius in front of a restaurant at a traditional sea ground located in the traditional sea area located in the same Dong-dong, Daegu-gu, as the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol level of 0.096%.

2. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act and the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act by driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol as above at the time stated in the preceding paragraph, and let the front distance in front of the restaurant for the traditional sea area, which is in the same roof-dong, Daegu-gu, turn to the left from the Cheongwon and the gas station at the

At this point, there is a yellow on-and-off signal and a place where traffic is frequent, so a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to operate the motor vehicle safely by making safe operation by making it possible to take into account the traffic conditions on the right and the right and the right and the right before entering the intersection.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in operating the taxi by neglecting it, thereby causing injury to the victim, such as crypt salt, etc. for about two weeks in need of medical treatment due to the shock of the vehicle, and at the same time, damaged KRW 2,044,828 at repair cost, such as the front gateer, etc. of the victim C (the 68-year-old taxi) driving on the right-hand side of the front wheeler of the vehicle for use by the Defendant.

3. No motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall be operated on a road;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the said car without mandatory insurance at the time and place specified in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident and a report on actual condition investigation;

1. The circumstantial report of a drinking driver, and the results of the control of drinking driving;

arrow