logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.20 2017고단789
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around 10:26 on November 9, 2016, the Defendant posted a false statement on the content that “the Defendant jointly purchases the pre-sale” to Internet Carbook C at his/her own residence located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and reported it to the victim D who expressed his/her intention to purchase the pre-sale, thereby allowing the victim D to receive delivery of the goods two days after the order.”

However, even if the defendant received the payment from the injured party, he did not have an intention to jointly purchase and deliver the goods.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victims as above; (b) received 16,500 won from the victims to the Saemaul Treasury account (F) account in the name of E on the same day from the victims; and (c) deceiving the victims by the aforementioned method from September 29, 2016 to November 11, 2016, as shown in the List 1 List of Crimes; and (b) received the remittance of KRW 624,430,00 in total from the victims on 26 occasions.

On October 10, 2016, the Defendant posted a false statement on the part of the Defendant’s residence located in Gwanak-gu in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, stating that “The Defendant jointly purchases (DALIE) medicine” in the Internet carpet C. The Defendant reported the intention of the purchase to the victim G who expressed the intention of the purchase. The Defendant stated that “if he/she jointly purchases (DALIE) medicine differently from the high price of the co-purchase, he/she would be able to receive delivery of goods two days after the order.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to jointly purchase and deliver the goods even if he received the price from the injured party, because he thought that it will be used for living expenses, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim as above, received 33,000 won from the one bank account (I) in the name of H on the same day from the victim; and (b) around that time, from November 2016.

arrow