The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged was cultivated by the Defendant from April 1, 2017 to June 14:30, 2017, 260 poppy cost, which is a raw material for narcotics, from Haju-si B, from April 13, 2017.

2. The Defendant consistently asserts to the effect that “the Defendant: (a) had consistently cultivated the seeds of fireworks spawn for the ornamental purposes; and (b) had never known the fact that they were both spawn; (c) had no additional evidence to confirm the authenticity of the above answer; (d) had the following facts: (a) whether the Defendant had the ability to distinguish “crewn spawn spawn,” which is regulated as narcotics, into the land; (b) whether the Defendant had the ability to distinguish them into the land; (c) the Defendant had been openly cultivated at the house; (d) the Defendant did not smoke or sell the cultivated spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn spawn span sn span span sn span s.

It is difficult to recognize it, and there is no other evidence to recognize it.

3. Conclusion, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of facts constituting a crime, the Defendant is acquitted pursuant to the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act (it does not disclose the summary of the judgment of innocence because the Defendant was absent on the sentencing date).