beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,500,000.
When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
The Defendant is the employer of the trade name of “C”, and the victim D(33) is the customer of the main store.
On February 2, 2017, the Defendant became a victim and a trial with the drinking value in front of the above C main points E in Chungcheong City around 01:10.
The defendant, on the ground that the victim was flicking, was flicked by the victim's flick, and the victim was flicked with the victim's flick, and the victim was flicked to another place from the victim's flick, who was flicked with the victim's flick, and flicked with the victim's flick and flick with the victim's flick
Summary of Evidence
1. Legal statement of the witness D;
1. A report on internal investigation (investigation into attachment of field CCTV images);
1. A medical opinion [The defendant, while intending to walk a victim at the time, did not contact the victim's bridge;
The argument is asserted.
However, the following circumstances are revealed by comprehensively taking account of the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, such as the written statement D and the police statement report (the reason why the written diagnosis of injury was not attached), the investigation report (the reason why the written diagnosis of injury was not attached) of the above evidence, i.e., CCTV images taken by the Defendant and the victim at the scene of the incident: (a) the Defendant’s body was faced with each other while the victim faces opposite to each other; and (b) the Defendant’s body was familiar with the body of the victim in the future and the victim’s body was confirmed immediately thereafter; (c) the Defendant’s appearance was likely to have contacted the body of the victim; and (d) the victim was assaulted with the hump from the time of the initial investigation to this court.
(3) In light of the fact that the victim received medical treatment at the emergency room of the Kan National University Chungcheong Hospital after the occurrence of the instant case, and according to the written medical opinion, the victim received medical treatment at the time, “a multi-lateral typology,” in fact, the Defendant is actually aware of.