The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On the second trial day of the summary of the facts charged, the facts charged was changed from an injury to an assault.

On October 6, 2016, the Defendant was driving on an emergency, etc. to park a cub in the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the 105-ro 105-ro 7,00,00 the price for the voice group in Chungcheongbuk-gun around 19:20, and the victim D’s indictment is written “F” but it is obvious that it is a clerical error.

(38) The Erash car operated by the vehicle was set up after the vehicle, and the victim's chest was set one time on the ground that the Erash car was cut out of the narrow space front of the defendant's vehicle.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

In this case, the victim D can be recognized as having been present as a witness at the second public trial date of this case and withdrawn his wish to punish the defendant. Thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.