logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.10.11 2018고단3356
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 2016, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was parked in front of a sobrying restaurant for mutual influent piracy in his own vehicle located in the middle of Daegu Doldong on the street; and (b) the Defendant: (c) “Isn’s son and son are going to go to a computer company in Seoul and do not enter the company in Seoul; and (d) Isn’s son and son, who want to go to go to the board of directors by expanding the room.

A loan of 1.5 million won shall be repaid later.

“.....”

However, in fact, the defendant's wife did not attend the computer company in Seoul, and the defendant was in bad credit condition at the time and was thought to use the above money for the payment of living expenses and taxes, so there was no intention or ability to repay the above money to the victim.

After all, the Defendant received 1.5 million won in cash from the injured party in the name of the borrowed money from the seat.

2. On June 2016, the Defendant stated that “The Defendant loaned KRW 18 million as it is necessary to collect money to find a house by taking a job on an inspection of a factory in which he/she would like to build a foundation for the pressure on the side of the strike in Gyeonggi-do,” at the mutual influence in the vicinity of the Daegu Suwon-gu Suwon-gu, and that “The Defendant borrowed KRW 18 million as it is necessary to start up a house.”

However, there was no fact that the Defendant was employed in C, and the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to repay the said money to the victim because he was willing to use the vehicle purchase cost, living cost, and personal debt with the said money.

After all, the Defendant received from the injured party a cash of KRW 18 million in the name of the borrowed money from the seat.

3. On January 2017, the Defendant stated that “Around the end of the year, the Defendant borrowed 15 million won in return for the purchase of feed vehicles to the said victim” at the mutual influence located in the E branch located in Daegu Suwon-gu, Suwon-gu, 2017.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have a plan to purchase feed vehicles, and was in bad credit standing, and was used as living expenses with the above money.

arrow