1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 26,280,00 with the Plaintiff and KRW 6% per annum from September 5, 2015 to October 7, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is operating the “E” telecom in Daegu-gu D (hereinafter “instant telecom”).

The Defendants are operating the human test company with the trade name of “F”.

B. On June 10, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a contract with the Defendants for remodeling construction with a total of KRW 520 million and the construction period from June 11, 2012 to September 11, 2012 (hereinafter “instant contract”).

C. The Defendant completed construction around September 2012, and the Plaintiff paid the remainder under the instant contract to the Defendants around October 9, 2012.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The Plaintiff’s assertion in light of the construction contract of this case, the Plaintiff asserted that, in the light of the construction contract of this case, the defect was caused by the Plaintiff’s error in construction, such as water leakage in the wall of this case, water leakage in the guest room, water leakage in the bath room, etc., and water leakage in the bath room, etc., the Plaintiff sought compensation in lieu of the defect repair.

3. Determination of defects

A. In light of the fact that the Plaintiff, as a matter of course, included a satisfy construction in the instant remodeling construction contract, and around 2008, performed a satisfying construction project that is not included in the estimate for remodeling the Hel located in Daegu-gu G, which was requested by the Defendants, the Plaintiff asserts that the instant contract also includes a satisfying construction. However, the Defendants did not perform such satisfy construction, and thus, this part constitutes a defect.

According to the purport of each of the statements and arguments in Gap evidence Nos. 2 and Eul evidence Nos. 3, the Corporation in this case is a remodelling work that repairs internal interior interior interior interior interior, etc., and the Defendants’ construction on the contents of the written estimates of construction in this case.