logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1981. 9. 22. 선고 81다638 판결
[가처분이의][공1981.11.15.9668),14383]
Main Issues

Whether the grounds for revocation of such provisional attachment or provisional disposition, which occurred after the decision of provisional attachment or provisional disposition, can be the grounds for objection (affirmative)

Summary of Judgment

The grounds for an objection against the decision of provisional attachment or provisional disposition include all the grounds for the existence of the preserved right and the necessity for its preservation which have arisen until the closing of argument. Therefore, the grounds for revocation of provisional attachment or provisional disposition that have occurred after the decision may also be the grounds for objection against provisional attachment or provisional disposition.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 703, 706, and 715 of the Civil Procedure Act

Applicant-Appellant

Attorney Park Jae-sik et al., Counsel for the applicant

Respondent-Appellee

Respondent 1 and 15 others, Counsel for defendant-appellee

original decision

Daegu High Court Decision 80Na498 delivered on February 18, 1981

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal shall be assessed against the petitioner.

Reasons

We examine the applicant's grounds of appeal.

In regard to an objection against the decision of provisional attachment or provisional disposition, the debtor can assert all the grounds arising from the existence of the preserved right and the necessity for its preservation until the closing of argument. Therefore, even if the grounds for revocation of provisional attachment or provisional disposition occurred after the decision are changed, the legal principles that can be considered as the grounds for objection to provisional attachment or provisional disposition even if the case is in progress, if there is a change in circumstances, it is merely an independent opinion that the execution court must apply for the cancellation of provisional attachment or provisional disposition due to changes in circumstances, and it cannot be accepted.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed without merit, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Lee Il-young (Presiding Justice)

arrow
심급 사건
-대구고등법원 1981.2.18.선고 80나498