The defendant shall pay 1,591,800 won to the plaintiff C, 250,000 won to the plaintiff A, and 2.50,000 won, respectively, and each of them shall be from October 16, 2019 to January 2021.

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant operated the “F Child Care Center” (hereinafter “Child Care Center in this case”) in Young-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.

2) Plaintiff C is a child who was enrolled in the instant childcare center, and Plaintiff A and B are the parents of Plaintiff C.

B. (1) On August 3, 2017, in the course of the instant childcare center’s special teaching hours, Plaintiff C was involved in an accident that fell from one’s seated, while Plaintiff C moved to another’s chair.

As a result, the plaintiff C suffered from the framework of the off-line body booms that require stability and medical treatment for four weeks.

2) On September 13, 2018, around September 13, 2018, the first half of the instant childcare center was suffering from an accident where the Plaintiff C was pushed down.

Plaintiff

A) on the same day, he was able to see that he was able to blick the phone between his quality and the resistance.

It was discussed.

[Grounds for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 4, 9 through 14 (including branch numbers), Eul evidence and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the circumstances and contents of each of the accidents of this case known in light of the above recognition of liability for damages, the defendant, the head of the child-care center of this case, is responsible for compensating the plaintiffs for the damages suffered by the accident of this case as a non-permanent supervisor for the protection and supervision of

As to this, the defendant asserts that the accident on August 3, 2017 of this case was excluded from the marrier of the plaintiff C, and that the accident on September 13, 2018 exceeded the plaintiff C itself, and that the other plaintiff was not responsible for the defendant.

The defendant's responsibility may not be exempted in light of all the circumstances shown in the argument of this case, such as the place, circumstances, contents, results, and possibility of accident prevention and predictability, which are acknowledged according to the evidence mentioned above.

3. Scope of damages;

A. According to the evidence evidence No. 6, Defendant C’s statement on the off-site medical expenses A, the date of the instant accident on August 3, 2017.