1. The Defendant’s KRW 20,000,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate from December 15, 2015 to May 11, 2017, and the following.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff and C are married couple who completed the marriage report on November 18, 2009.

B. Around January 2015, the Defendant knew of C who was working at the same workplace and became to contact with each other from June 2015.

C. C was determined on September 4, 2015 by prescribing the oral fee system.

Around September 25, 2015, the Defendant made a statement to the Plaintiff, Manman or the Plaintiff that it was a crime against the Plaintiff, and that it was sent to the Plaintiff with a large amount of address.

E. The Defendant was convicted of a fine of KRW 4,500,000 (the Daejeon District Court 2016Ma491) as to the facts of the following crimes (the Defendant, the injured party, and the injured party). The judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

Defendant

From June 2015, the victim's spouse is a person who has a relationship with C with the victim's spouse.

In June 2015, the Defendant entered the residence of the said victim for the purpose of having sexual intercourse with C when the victim and his/her family reside in the second week of June 2015.

2. On June 2015, the Defendant entered the same place as the fourth week, the same purpose, and intruded on the residence of the said victim.

On July 2015, the Defendant infringed upon the residence of the said victim by entering the same place as the second week, and for the same purpose.

On July 2015, the Defendant infringed upon the residence of the said victim by entering the same place, and for the same purpose.

On July 2015, the Defendant entered the same place as the fourth week, and intruded on the residence of the said victim for the same purpose.

On August 2015, the Defendant invadedd the residence of the said victim for the same purpose in the second week and in the same place, and for the same purpose.

On August 2015, the Defendant infringed upon the residence of the said victim by entering the same place as the third week, and for the same purpose.

On August 2015, the defendant entered the same place as fourth week, fourth week, and for the same purpose, respectively, in the residence of the above victim.