Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On March 17, 2016, from around 22:30 to 22:50 the same day, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business: (a) was under the influence of alcohol in a car page operated by the victim C in Daegu-gu Seo-gu, Daegu-gu, and thereby lost the Defendant’s wall on the above car page; and (b) thereby, the Defendant sent the Defendant’s wall to the Defendant “Ih, Ih, har

D. The Defendant expressed a large lux, “Acing the Defendant’s mersh with the wall, laid down the door door, laid down the stand spacker at that place in his hand, and expressed his name unstring male customers who were seated on the table spacks, and obstructed the victim’s car merp business by force by force.

2. On March 17, 2016, at the same place as before and after March 17, 2016, the Defendant: (a) was required to present an identification card to verify the Defendant’s personal information from D District Guard E and Inspector F of the Daegu Seo-gu Police Station D District, Daegu, Seo-gu, Police Station, which was dispatched after receiving a report on 112 on the same ground as in the preceding paragraph; (b) without disclosing the personal information, the Defendant stated that “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am

“In doing a bath theory, F assaulted F on a hand the left chest of F with a knife.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made to F or C by the police;

1. Application of CCTV photographs and CCTV-2 CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes that obstruct the performance of public duties;

1. Article 314 (1) and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Consideration, such as the fact that there is no criminal record, except for a case where the sentence of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (hereinafter “the Criminal Procedure Act”) was imposed on February 12, 198 with respect to an attempted special larceny and the sentence of two years suspended on the grounds that he/she had been sentenced to a suspended sentence of eight months;