1. The Defendants’ respective KRW 11,396,783 to the Plaintiffs, respectively, and 5% per annum from September 21, 2018 to December 3, 2019, respectively.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. (i) The Plaintiffs are co-owners of the Ephapt in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu (hereinafter “instant apartment”) F (hereinafter “F”) and reside in the above F F, and the Defendants are co-owners of the above G (hereinafter “G”) and reside in the above subparagraph G.

B. On April 28, 2018, around 02:00, the fire alarm level was written in F, and the employees of the apartment management office of this case discovered that water was found in Fho Lake Lake, while inspecting the fire fighters, the employees of the apartment management office of this case were justifiable to remove the fire fighters to prevent leakage, and to refrain from using the fire fighters to prevent leakage.

Article 22(1) of the Reference Act provides that “The plaintiffs shall be responsible for the damages incurred to the apartment of this case, and shall be responsible for the damages incurred to the apartment of this case.” Article 3(1) provides that the plaintiffs shall be responsible for the damages incurred to the apartment of this case.

Applicant on May 17, 2018, the employees of the apartment management office of the instant case visited heading G with the Plaintiffs on May 17, 2018, and confirmed that water was leaked at the distribution season below G heading cream.

(v) May 23, 2013, the Plaintiffs requested the Defendants to replace the said distribution machine, and the Defendants replaced on June 13, 2018.

After the replacement of the above distribution machine, there was no longer leakage in Fho Lake.

⑹ 원고들은 2018. 7. 27. 피고들에게 F호 주방 및 작은방 벽에 누수가 발생하였다고 통보하였고, 이에 피고들은 G호 화장실에 설치된 욕조를 철거하고 방수공사를 하였으며, 이후 F호에는 별다른 누수가 발생하지 아니하였다.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 to 8, Eul evidence 1 to 8, Eul evidence 1-1 to 8, the appraisal result of this court's appraiser H, the purport of the whole pleadings

B. (1) According to the above facts of recognition, it is recognized that the damage to Fho Lake owned by the Plaintiffs was incurred due to the leakage occurring in G, which is owned by the Defendants.