1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff falling under the following order of payment shall be revoked.

1. The basic facts of the claim (1) The plaintiffs are co-owners of the 20th apartment building (hereinafter "the plaintiff's apartment building") E (hereinafter "the plaintiff's apartment building as the 20th apartment building on the ground, which was completed on July 24, 1993 (hereinafter "the plaintiff's apartment building"). The plaintiff's section for exclusive use is 153.235 square meters on the ground of the plaintiff's apartment building (the plaintiff's claim in this case was filed on the premise that the plaintiff is a 1/2 share owner), and the defendant did not file the claim in this case on December 21, 2007, after acquiring the ownership of the apartment of this case on December 21, 2007, occupied the ownership of the apartment of this case (the plaintiff's family members live in the plaintiff's apartment building) and carried out

On November 15, 2011, the Defendant owned the instant apartment F, which is the immediate upper floor of the Plaintiff’s apartment (hereinafter “Defendant apartment”) by no later than May 15, 201, after acquiring the ownership of the instant apartment F, which is the immediate upper floor of the Plaintiff’s apartment (hereinafter “Defendant apartment”).

(2) On January 2016, 2016, Defendant apartment pipelines (in relation to the location where the leakage occurred, see the following Paragraph (5)) occurred (in relation to the location where the leakage occurred) and around January 25, 2016, Plaintiff’s apartment bank, the living room, and the ceiling and the wall were diversed on the wall.

(hereinafter referred to as “the instant water”). At the time, the water (melted) that was being in the room of the Plaintiff’s apartment building and the remote area of the inside bank was to flow out, to the extent that the water flows out.

The employees of the instant apartment management office, upon receiving the instant water leakage report on January 25, 2016, set the water valve (water pipe valves of air-conditioning and hot water) from the water measuring apparatus located adjacent to the entrance to the Defendant apartment. Since then, water leakage did not occur on the water tank of the Defendant apartment.

(3) Afterwards, the Plaintiffs requested the Defendant to repair the Plaintiff apartment, and presented a written estimate of the cost (per approximately KRW 4,300,000) incurred in cultivating the ceiling and the wall, and the Defendant is too unreasonable for the amount stated in the written estimate.