beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On January 4, 2019, at around 17:12, 2019, the Defendant: (a) visited the Defendant’s residence located in Chungcheongnam-si, B with the Internet site “C” by accessing the Defendant’s cell phone from the Defendant’s residence; and (b) contacted the victim D with “blus inserted in B”; and (c) called “on deposit of the price of the goods, delivery of the goods will be made.”
However, the defendant did not intend to send the goods even if he received the payment from the victim D.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, as seen above, by deceiving the victim D and received KRW 50,00 from the victim D to the corporate bank account (F) in the name of E on the same day, and, from June 16, 2019, acquired each total of KRW 4,517,00 on 51 occasions, such as the list of crimes in attached Form No. 19.
"2019 Highest 424"
1. On June 15, 2019, the Defendant: (a) contacted the Defendant’s home located in Chungcheong City B with the Internet portal site C at the Defendant’s Internet portal site; (b) contacted the Victim G with the Defendant’s home located in Chungcheongnam-si; and (c) falsely told the Defendant “I will send the Defendant a door-to-door if the payment is confirmed” posted by the Victim G.
However, even if the defendant received the price from the victim, he did not intend to sell the goods.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained 40,000 won from the post office account (H) in the name of the Defendant on the same day from the victim and acquired it by deception.
2. On June 21, 2019, around 20:23, the Defendant, at the above Defendant’s office, visited the Internet portal site J at the Internet portal site and posted by the victim I, inserted the “2019 MOS teaching materials of the general theory of administrative law.”
A false statement was made, “on payment, to send it to a convenience store” by reporting and communicating a purchase writing.
However, even if the defendant received the price from the victim, he did not intend to sell the goods.
Nevertheless, the Defendant is above.