The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The Defendant and the victim C (the age of 72) of the instant facts charged are the line and the post-line, known in the same Eastern.

At around 15:00 on March 15, 2014, the Defendant and the victim were able to play scam in front of E Real Estate located in D, and the victim was able to take a scam with the victim, and the Defendant was also able to take a scam for the victim.

Accordingly, while the defendant and the victim were involved, the defendant was faced with the floor by entering the back of the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant set up a closing frame of L3 parts, which requires about 8 weeks of treatment to the above victim.

2. In a judgment of conviction in a criminal trial, the conviction ought to be based on evidence of probative value, which leads a judge to have a conviction that is beyond a reasonable doubt, to such a degree that the facts charged are true. Therefore, in a case where the prosecutor’s proof fails to sufficiently reach the degree that such conviction would lead to, the determination ought to be based on the defendant’s benefit even if there

(Supreme Court Decision 201Do15767 Decided February 13, 2014, etc.). However, in light of the following facts and circumstances acknowledged by the prosecutor’s evidence submitted by the prosecutor, there is reasonable doubt as to whether the Defendant suffered bodily injury as stated in the facts charged.

A. In this case where the defendant consistently denies the facts charged from the investigative agency, the only evidence supporting the prosecutor’s above facts charged is C’s investigative agency and this court’s statement.

However, the summary of the statement in C’s investigative agency and this court stated that the Defendant inflicted an injury on the floor by citing himself, and that “the cause of the injury or the presumed injury” in the investigation record is indicated as “the cause of the injury” as the “the cause of the injury caused or presumed to have been caused by young people and scraf and scraf, and scrafed (based on the patient’s statement).”