The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds of appeal is that the Defendant did not inflict any injury on C with kneee.

2. 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정할 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 C이 수사기관에서부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 일관하여 2016. 3. 12. 피고인에게 테니스 코트를 사용할 수 없다고 말한 후 언쟁을 하다가 피고인이 발로 무릎을 찼다고

F. The statement that the defendant stated, in the court of the court below, specifically stated that he knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee knee kne knee kne kne

As a result of the examination of the above Council member's intention, C suffered 3.9 million won from the base base and tension of the outer side part of the above Council member requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment, damage to the scare of the following bridge, gymnasium, gymnasium, and failed to find out the details of C's health insurance benefit in light of the following facts: (a) the Defendant remitted the amount of KRW 3.90,00 to C for medical treatment expenses through gymnasium on May 2, 2016; and (b) C's health insurance benefit payment details, and (c) it is not possible to find out any details to suspect that C had been snastyed before the instant case or suffered from injury due to the developments different from

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.